Trump Urges a Fight As New Pennsylvania Map Could Help Democrats Win Congress

“Don’t let the Dems take elections away from you so that they can raise taxes & waste money!” the president tweeted.

The new congressional map enacted by the Pennsylvania state supreme court.Pennsylvania Supreme Court/

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

The Pennsylvania state supreme court adopted a new electoral map for the state on Monday that could help Democrats win several additional seats in Congress. The move attracted immediate opposition from state Republicans as well as President Donald Trump, who urged Republicans to challenge the new map at the US Supreme Court.

Last month, the state’s top court found that Pennsylvania’s congressional map, one of the most gerrymandered in the country, violated the state’s constitution. On Monday, the court implemented a map that it commissioned from a Stanford Law School gerrymandering expert, after the Republican-controlled legislature and Democratic governor failed to agree on a replacement map. 

On Tuesday morning, Trump tweeted:

Since 2011, Republicans in Pennsylvania have consistently won 13 of the state’s 18 congressional seats, even though the state is split nearly evenly between Democrats and Republicans. The new court-imposed map comes closer to creating an even partisan balance. Trump received more votes than Hillary Clinton in 10 of the 18 new districts in 2016, but in a year that favors Democrats, the state would likely elect nine Democrats and nine Republicans to Congress.

Republicans plan to fight the new map in federal court. The Republican leaders in the state legislature who drew the old map, Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati and House Speaker Mike Turzai, intend to sue in federal court to block the new map from being implemented. They argue that the state supreme court does not have the power to overturn a map passed by the legislature. But Scarnati and Turzai already used that argument when they asked the US Supreme Court last month to block the state supreme court’s order, and they were unsuccessful. Justice Samuel Alito, a conservative, denied the appeal without even referring it to the other justices.

As election law expert Rick Hasen explained on his blog, Republicans have two options: Try again with Alito, who oversees appeals from Pennsylvania, or file a new federal case in district court. Both, Hasen concludes, are unlikely to succeed. The US Supreme Court, he predicts, is unlikely to change its mind, especially as primary elections draw near. A new federal case, he writes, would be a “super longshot” because federal courts generally decline to overturn state court decisions interpreting state constitutions. “[I]t is hard to see where Republicans go from here to successfully fight these maps,” he writes.

Still, Republicans, with the president’s support, appear willing to take their chances on a longshot, and intend to file a case this week.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend