Trump Tries to Block Democratic Counter Memo on Russia Investigation

The president had no problem with Devin Nunes error-filled memo, but wants no part of the Dem’s response.

Sipa via AP Images

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Donald Trump was in such a hurry to release Rep. Devin Nunes’ (R-Calif.) memo on alleged political bias behind the Russia investigation, he told a lawmaker at the State of the Union address last month that he would “100 percent” release it—even before he read it. But, on Friday evening, after having actually read a counter memo written by Democratic lawmakers who said their goal was to provide badly missing context, Trump said he wouldn’t allow it to see the light of day. Ultimately, the decision may not be up to Trump, but he continued his offensive against the Democrats’ counter memo on Saturday morning.

The question, for both memos, revolves around the release of classified information. Both describe the process of how the Department of Justice obtained a FISA warrant—the warrant issued by a secret court that allows American citizens to have their communications monitored by the U.S. intelligence and law enforcement. 

The Nunes memo was written by Republican staffers on the House Intelligence Committee that Nunes is chairman of, but Congressional Democrats and a number of high-ranking DOJ officials said the memo relied heavily on cherry-picked facts that gave the public an inaccurate portrayal of what really happened. Among other assertions, the Nunes memo tried to portray the DOJ’s request for a FISA warrant against a Trump campaign operative as entirely based on the Steele Dossier, which had been compiled with funding by Democratic operatives. Top DOJ officials opposed the release of the original memo, arguing that it revealed too much about the methods used by investigators in tracking foreign threats, but Trump seemed unswayed by any of the concerns.

Prior to the Nunes memo’s release, a number of Congressional Republicans and conservative pundits described the contents as horrifying, though upon its actual release, the memo seemed far less damning than it had been portrayed. In fact, it actually seemed to make the case that the Steele Dossier did not kick off the investigation into the Trump campaign’s connections to Russia at all. That didn’t stop Trump from publicly crowing, incorrectly, that the memo “totally vindicates ‘Trump’ in probe”.  

The counter memo was prepared by Democratic staffers on the House Intelligence Committee, and is said to be significantly longer than the four-page Nunes memo. Although Trump’s Saturday morning tweet portrayed the memo’s arrival on his desk as the work of Democrats, the House Intelligence Committee voted, unanimously, to release the counter memo earlier this week. 

Democrats reacted angrily to Trump’s decision, with House Minority Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) accusing Trump of trying to hide the truth. “The President’s decision to block the Democratic memo from release is part of a dangerous and desperate pattern of cover-up on the part of the President,” Pelosi said Friday night. “Clearly, the President has something to hide.”

Despite Trump’s objection to its release and command that it be rewritten, the issue may be out of his hands. The rules governing the release of the memo put Congress in the driver’s seat. Following the Intelligence Committee’s vote to release the memo, the president has the right to object, but now that he has, the committee can either make the changes he suggests or try to override the decision by voting to allow the entire House of Representatives to decide whether to release it. 

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest