The Official Next in Line to Oversee the Russia Investigation Just Stepped Down

The future of the probe is now even more uncertain.

Rachel Brand is sworn-in during her confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in March 2017. Ron Sachs/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

The third-highest ranking official at the Justice Department, Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand, will step down after just nine months on the job, the New York Times reported Friday. Her departure could impact the future of the Russia investigation overseen by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

Right now, the Mueller investigation is overseen by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. But Brand was next in line to take over if Rosenstein recused himself, or was removed and not immediately replaced.

Brand is a staunch conservative, and close watchers of the Justice Department wondered whether she would resist efforts by the White House or Congressional Republicans to stymie the investigation, or follow orders, if given, to fire Mueller.

A 2016 Justice Department memo outlines the order of succession in overseeing the investigation if Rosenstein is recused or removed before Brand is replaced, according to Buzzfeed. That memo states that the person next in line is Solicitor General Noel Francisco.

Such an event would echo one of the major events in the Watergate Scandal. Back in 1973, during President Nixon’s famous Saturday Night Massacre, it fell to the solicitor general, Robert Bork, to fire the Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox, who was investigating the Watergate scandal. After the attorney general and his deputy resigned rather than fire Cox, Bork became attorney general and fired him.

A spokeswoman for the Justice Department, Sarah Isgur Flores, confirmed to Mother Jones that the solicitor general is next in line. “If there isn’t a senate confirmed Associate AG, the SG is next in line for the order of succession,” she said.

This story has been updated to include the response from the Justice Department.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend