Dick’s Sporting Goods to Stop Selling Assault Rifles

“If the kids can be brave enough to organize like this, we can be brave enough to take these out of here.”

Richard B. Levine/ZUMA

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

Dick’s Sporting Goods, one of the largest sports retailers in the country, announced Wednesday that it will stop selling assault-style rifles, and will no longer sell firearms to anyone under 21 years old. The changes, which are a direct response to the Parkland, Florida, school shooting earlier this month, will be effective immediately.

The retailer had stopped selling assault rifles in its main stores after the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary in 2012, but continued to sell them at its Field & Stream locations—until today. 

CEO Edward Stack credited the students and families demanding action in the wake of the shooting with inspiring the company’s move.

“Based on what’s happened and looking at those kids and those parents, it moved us all unimaginably,” Stack said in an interview with ABC’s “Good Morning America” on Wednesday. “To think about the loss and the grief that those kids and those parents had, we said we need to do something and we’re taking these guns out of all of are stores permanently.”

Stack said the decision would never be reversed, and called on lawmakers to move beyond partisan politics to help reduce gun violence.

The decision follows the revelation that the suspected shooter in the Parkland shooting, Nikolas Cruz, had bought a shotgun at a Dick’s store in November 2017, although he did not use that particular gun to carry out the massacre at Stoneman Douglas High School.

On ABC, Stack expressed alarm that even though Dick’s had done “everything by the book” in conducting the sale, nothing had prevented Cruz from being able to legally obtain a gun at a Dick’s location. “We did everything that the law required and still he was able to buy a gun,” he said. “When we looked at that, we said, ‘The systems that are in place across the board just aren’t effective enough to keep us from selling someone a gun like that.'”

“If the kids can be brave enough to organize like this, we can be brave enough to take these out of here,” Stack continued.

In a pair of tweets, Dick’s outlined key steps it was taking to reduce gun violence, along with action items for Congress to take on legislatively. 

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest