Democrats Just Won a Special Election That Should Terrify Republicans

A 31-point swing.

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Republicans in Washington have gotten some encouraging news in recent weeks. The generic-ballot polling average, which for months had shown Democrats with a double-digit edge in November’s congressional elections, narrowed to just 5 percentage points last week. But on the local level, the early indicators suddenly look much, much worse for the GOP. On Tuesday, Missouri held special elections in four deep-red state house districts that President Donald Trump carried by huge margins in 2016. Democrats picked up one seat, House District 97, after a 31-point swing. Another GOP candidate squeaked by with 53 percent of the vote in a district Trump carried by a whopping 59-point margin in 2016. In the other two districts, Democrats narrowed their final margins by 29 and 38 percentage points, respectively.

Missouri Republicans are experiencing a particularly rough moment right now because the state’s GOP governor, Eric Greitens, is under investigation for allegedly blackmailing a woman he had an affair with—not the kind of thing that gets the grassroots fired up. (Greitens has acknowledged the affair but denies the blackmail claims.) But what happened in Missouri can’t be placed entirely on the governor. According to Daily Kos Elections, there have now been eight special elections for state legislature seats in 2018. In every one of those elections, Democrats have improved by double digits compared to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 performance in the districts, flipping two seats in the process. The average Democratic improvement for 2018 special elections has been 27 points. Over the course of 70 special elections in 2017, the average margin of improvement was 10 points.

It’s certainly possible that the national numbers will continue to improve for Republicans—maybe the military parade will do the trick. But special elections for local offices are the ultimate enthusiasm test. And right now, only one party’s activists are really showing up.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend