A New Poll Shows a Dramatic Change in How Americans View Gun Control

The Parkland shooting appears to have shifted public opinion in a big way.

Hundreds of students and community activists marched in protest of the inaction of lawmakers on the issue of gun violence, on February 23, 2018 in Tampa, Fla.Monica Herndon/ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Back in 2011, after a gunman in Tucson killed six people and wounded 13, including US Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, Americans took a fatalistic view of whether anything could be done to stop future mass shootings. A CNN poll at the time showed that voters believed by a 2-1 margin that there was nothing the government could do to prevent future attacks. 

Seven years later, that’s all changed. A new poll released by CNN on Sunday found that 64 percent of American voters now believe the government can “take action that will be effective” in preventing mass shootings in the future. Only 32 percent believe that such attacks will happen “regardless” of government action. The poll comes a week and a half after the Feb 14 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida left 17 dead.

Here’s how the new numbers compare to poll results after previous mass shootings:

What’s more, Americans are remarkably clear on exactly which steps they want the government to take. According to a separate poll released Sunday, conducted by USA Today/Suffolk University:

  • 63 percent of voters believe AR-15s and other semi-automatic weapons should be banned.
  • 61 percent believe tightening gun laws and background checks would prevent more mass shootings.
  • 76 percent believe people who have received treatment for a mental illness should be banned from owning guns.

Of course, just because people believe that government action would be effective, doesn’t mean they have confidence the government will act. Only about 1 in 5 respondents in the USA Today poll believe that Congress will take action on gun control: 28 percent of Republicans, and 14 percent of Democrats.

Since the shooting, teen survivors of the tragedy continue to drum up national attention on the issue; the most famous of the bunch, Emma González, now has more Twitter followers than the National Rifle Association. But as Republican members of Congress return after a 10-day break, the Associated Press reports, they don’t appear to have much in the works. Even the most likely path forward—a modest bill to improve the accuracy of the federal background check system—has stalled, because it’s tied to a pro-gun plan to allow gun permits in one state to be recognized in all other states.

Meanwhile, President Donald Trump is earning some of his worst job approval marks of his presidency. Just 38 percent of voters currently approve of Trump’s job performance, the USA Today poll found—the lowest the president has ever scored, by their measure. According to Sunday’s CNN poll, Trump’s approval rating is down to 35 percent.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend