Trump Slams Controversial Spying Program His White House Aggressively Supports

Taking his cues from Fox News—once again.

Cheriss May/ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Congress on Thursday is set to vote on whether to extend a controversial section in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which for years allowed the government to collect domestic phone records and internet communications without a warrant.

But as the White House aggressively lobbies to preserve the section and reject an amendment imposing new restrictions on the government’s surveillance efforts, President Donald Trump on Thursday appeared to undercut his administration’s position by openly questioning whether the program may have unlawfully spied on his campaign.

The confounding tweet came just hours after White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders released a statement warning Congress against the amendment, arguing that it would reestablish “the walls between intelligence and law enforcement.” It also marked a return to Trump’s baseless claim that the Obama administration wiretapped Trump Tower during the presidential campaign. 

Nearly two hours after it was published, Trump attempted to get in line with his administration’s messaging with the following: 

What could possibly explain Trump’s initial contradiction? As Matthew Gertz of Media Matters noted, Trump’s tweet emerged shortly after Fox News commentator Andrew Napolitano—a 9/11 truther who was briefly suspended from the network in March over his unverified claims that British intelligence officials were spying on Trump—asserted on air that the president’s “woes” started with unlawful surveillance on his campaign afforded by the program.

Earlier on Thursday, Trump also slammed Hillary Clinton and questioned whether she had any nefarious ties to the Russian government. The familiar attack comes more than 14 months since he won the election, and less than 10 days until he celebrates a year in office.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest