Trump’s Deputy Attorney General Says There Is No Good Cause to Fire Robert Mueller

Many conservatives want the special counsel removed.


Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein told lawmakers on Wednesday that he has not identified any reason to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller, despite growing calls from supporters of President Donald Trump to do so. Rosenstein added that if Trump ordered him to fire Mueller, who is leading the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, he would refuse to comply unless there was “good cause” to justify Mueller’s removal.

“As I’ve explained previously, I would follow the regulation: If there was good cause, I would act,” Rosenstein told the House Judiciary Committee. “If there were no good cause, I would not.”

“And you’ve seen no good cause so far?” Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) asked.

“Correct,” Rosenstein replied.

Rosenstein, who was appointed by Trump in February, became the top Department of Justice official overseeing the FBI’s Russia probe after Attorney General Jeff Sessions was forced to recuse himself from the matter. After Trump, with the backing of Rosenstein and Sessions, fired FBI Director James Comey in May, Rosenstein appointed Mueller to lead the investigation.

Rosenstein’s testimony Wednesday comes at a time when some conservatives have escalated their calls to dismiss Mueller, whose investigation in recent weeks has led to guilty pleas from two Trump campaign associates and the indictment of two others. Mueller’s critics have argued that investigators assigned to the Russia probe are biased against Trump and have raised concerns about FBI officials’ connections to Fusion GPS, the research firm behind the so-called Steele dossier.

On Wednesday, Rosenstein also dismissed concerns that Mueller may be inappropriately expanding his investigation into matters unrelated to Russian interference.

“There are a lot of media stories speculating what the special counsel may or may not be doing,” Rosenstein told lawmakers. “I know what he’s doing. I am appropriately exercising my oversight responsibilities. So I can assure you that the special counsel is conducting himself consistently.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend