Trump Falsely Claims Corker Was “Set Up” to Criticize Him During Interview

He also dubbed the Republican senator “Liddle Bob Corker.”

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

President Donald Trump on Tuesday accused the New York Times of surreptitiously recording a recent interview with Sen. Bob Corker, in which the Tennessee Republican called out the president’s alarming “volatility.” The baseless claim comes on the heels of an extraordinarily public feud between the two men, with Corker saying publicly what many congressional Republicans only utter behind closed doors, including fears that Trump’s recklessness could spark another World War.

A transcript of the interview published Monday shows Corker explicitly acknowledging that he is speaking on the record. Times reporter Jonathan Martin also responded to Trump’s bizarre claim, adding that two of Corker’s aides, who were were on the line during the conversation, were also taping the call:

Corker’s increasingly blunt criticism of the president in recent months lead to the current clash. The mounting discord between the two boiled over on Sunday, when Trump claimed Corker “begged” him to endorse his re-election campaign. Corker, who is not seeking another term, hit back and called the White House an “adult day care center.” He subsequently gave his no-holds barred interview to the Times.

“Sen. Corker is certainly entitled to his own opinion, but he’s not entitled to his own facts,” White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said during a press briefing Tuesday. “The fact is that this president has been an incredibly strong leader on foreign policy and national security, and he’s been a leader on this front.” Sanders then read through a list of the president’s supposed achievements.

Trump’s sparring with members of his own party and perceived allies also extended to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. In a separate interview with Forbes published Tuesday, Trump dismissed reports Tillerson disparaged him as a “moron” over the summer, but still challenged his secretary of state to an IQ test.

“I think it’s fake news, but if he did that, I guess we’ll have to compare IQ tests,” Trump told the magazine. “And I can tell you who is going to win.”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest