There’s Very Little Welfare Left for Trump to Reform

In many states, fewer than one out of every 10 poor families receive TANF benefits.

Protesters demonstrate in Los Angeles in 1996 against the welfare reform bill.Frank Wiese/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

At a meeting with his Cabinet on Monday, President Donald Trump hinted at his next big agenda item: welfare reform. “Some people are really taking advantage of the system,” he said, according to Bloomberg White House correspondent Jennifer Jacobs.

The problem is that there’s very little welfare left to reform. After President Bill Clinton and Republicans in Congress ended welfare as we knew it in 1996, transforming the entitlement program into a block grant called Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), the number of poor people receiving federal cash assistance plummeted, along with the monthly benefits. The budget for the program has remained unchanged at $16 billion since 1996; inflation has reduced its actual value by a third since then.

In 1979, more than 80 percent of families living below the federal poverty line received welfare benefits under the old Aid to Families With Dependent Children program. By 2015, that figure had fallen to just 23 percent, according to a report by the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

In 46 states, there are currently more families living in deep poverty—meaning on less than 50 percent of the federal poverty line—than there are receiving TANF benefits.

Congress may not have done much with the TANF program in recent years, but states have. In many conservative red states, the sorts of “reforms” in which Trump might be interested—harsher sanctions, stricter work requirements, shorter time limits—have already taken place, with devastating results for poor families. In 14 states, fewer than one in 10 poor families receive TANF benefits.

In Vice President Mike Pence’s home state of Indiana, the number of families receiving TANF has fallen nearly 80 percent since 2006, according to CBPP, from 35 of every 100 poor Indiana families to just seven. In Louisiana, only four of every 100 poor families receive TANF.

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Many of the families technically receiving TANF benefits aren’t actually getting any cash, but instead things like childcare vouchers and enrollment in dubious marriage promotion programs. States today spend only about a quarter of their federal TANF funding on cash assistance, down from 70 percent in 1996. The rest of the money has been diverted to other priorities, such as pre-K and abstinence programs. Texas, for instance, in 2014, provided cash benefits to only 5 out of every 100 poor families in the state—and it was a paltry $277 a month for a family of three.

Given these numbers, Trump might have trouble finding anyone who actually receives a welfare check, much less anyone taking advantage of the system.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend