House Democrats Demand Answers From the Trump Campaign’s Data Firms

The CEO of one firm, Cambridge Analytica, reportedly offered to team up with Wikileaks to find Clinton’s emails.

Shawn Thew/ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

The top Democrats on the House judiciary and oversight committees have sent a letter to several data analytics companies, including Cambridge Analytica, seeking answers about their involvement in Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.

Cambridge Analytica, which White House senior adviser Jared Kushner has credited with helping secure Trump’s White House victory, has come under increasing scrutiny in connection with ongoing probes into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. This week, the Daily Beast reported that the firm’s CEO Alexander Nix personally reached out to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange last year with an offer to help track down a trove of Hillary Clinton’s missing emails. Assange, who declined the offer, confirmed to the Daily Beast that Nix had sent an email with the proposal. 

The firm, where ex-White House strategist Stephen Bannon once served as a vice president, is partly owned by hedge fund mogul and top Trump backer Robert Mercer. The letter on Thursday was also sent to four other companies, including Giles-Parscale. On Tuesday, the House intelligence committee interviewed that company’s co-founder, Brad Parscale, about Russian interference in the 2016 election.

“The prospect that any American company may have aided a foreign government, worked with hostile foreign actors, or benefitted from unlawfully accessed information is concerning and could impact the consideration of ongoing legislation,” the letter, signed by Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) and Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), reads. “Accordingly, we ask that you provide information and documents in response to the following questions.”

The Trump campaign has since attempted to downplay its work with the company, which it reportedly paid $5.9 million, making it its top vendor. “Leading into the election, the RNC had invested in the most sophisticated data-targeting program in modern American history, which helped secure our victory in the fall,” Trump campaign director Michael Glassner said in a statement Wednesday. “We were proud to have worked with the RNC and its data experts and relied on them as our main source for data analytics.”

Read the full letter here:


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend