Al Franken Tears Into Jeff Sessions Over Shifting Narratives on Russia Meetings

“By the end, we’re going to a 75-yard field goal.”

Bill Clark/ZUMA

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday, Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) hammered Attorney General Jeff Sessions for claiming he could no longer recall the content of his conversations with former Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak, after he emphatically told lawmakers months ago that he never discussed campaign-related issues with Russian officials.

“How your responses morphed from ‘I did not have any communications with the Russians’ to ‘I did not discuss the political campaign’ and then finally going to ‘I did not discuss interference in the election’—that to me is moving the goal post every time,” Franken said. “By the end, we’re going to a 75-yard field goal.”

“Saying ‘I didn’t discuss interfering in the election is your last statement,’ that’s a very different bar than ‘I can tell you I did not meet with any Russians.'” he added.

Sessions then complained about about the length of time dedicated to Franken’s “improperly framed” questions. 

“So he gets to do about 10 minutes, improperly framing the subject, and I’m given a short chance to respond?” he said.

The intense line of questioning came during Sessions’ much anticipated hearing before the Judiciary Committee, where the attorney general repeatedly refused to answer questions about his conversations with Trump, claiming it was “well established that a president is entitled to have private, confidential communications with his cabinet officials.” He also angrily rejected some lawmakers’ claims that his shifting narratives proved he was not being candid with the committee.

Sessions, who denied meeting with any Russian officials during the campaign, was forced to recuse himself from the ongoing Russia investigations after previously undisclosed meetings with Kislyak were revealed. Watch the exchange here: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeUWZnTG5UM

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest