Trump Hands 80 Percent of Proposed Tax Cut to Top 1 Percent

New study shows the super-rich will end up getting $1 million per year.

President Donald Trump smiles at Kuwait's Emir Sheikh Sabah Al Ahmad Al Sabah at a September news conference.Evan Vucci/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

President Donald Trump is insisting that he won’t personally benefit from his new tax plan. That’s been obviously false from the start. Now a new analysis from the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center shows just how detached that claim is from reality.

According to TPC’s preliminary estimate, the top 1 percent of Americans will get 53 percent of the benefits under Trump’s plan next year, and 79.7 percent by 2027. The numbers for the top 0.1 percent of Americans are even more extreme. By 2027, the top 0.1 percent would get an annual average tax cut of $1.02 million. The bottom 60 percent of Americans would get $233 on average, or 8.7 percent of all cuts. In other words, the average tax cut for the top 0.1 percent is 4,386 larger than what most Americans would get. Americans who make between $150,000 and $300,000 would actually pay about $800 more under Trump’s plan.

TPC estimates that the plan would reduce total tax revenue by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. Republicans’ plan to eliminate some tax deductions would increase individual tax revenue by almost $500 billion over the next decade. But those gains would be wiped out by $2.6 trillion of business tax cuts. (Another $240 billion in losses would come from eliminating estate taxes on the share of inheritances exceeding $5.5 million for individuals and $11 million for couples.)

Republicans are trying to discredit estimates like TPC’s by arguing they vastly underestimate the amount of economic growth the GOP plan would create. But as Mother Jones has written, hardly any economists believe that. TPC also expects Republicans’ plan to have little effect on economic growth. 

Trump and administration officials’ efforts to defend their plan are looking increasingly out of touch. On Thursday, Trump’s chief economic adviser Gary Cohn, who is worth hundreds of millions thanks to his years working at Goldman Sachs, said middle class Americans could use a $1,000 tax cut to buy a new car or renovate a kitchen. The day before, Trump attacked the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), a provision that blocks wealthy people from using loopholes to pay next to nothing in taxes. “You’re all familiar with it,” Trump said.

That seems unlikely. Almost no one who makes less than $200,00 per year pays the AMT. But we know Trump is intimately familiar with it. In 2005, the AMT cost him $31 million. Without it, he would have ended up paying $5.3 million in income tax on $150 million of income. Trump’s tax plan eliminates the AMT.




Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend