Federal Court Slaps Down Texas Voter ID Law—Again

The state’s attempt at a fix is still discriminatory, a judge rules.

In 2016, a Texas polling place sign tells voters of identification requirements based off of the state's 2011 voter I.D. law, which a federal court found intentionally discriminatory.AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

On Wednesday, a federal judge in Corpus Christi issued a permanent injunction against Texas’s draconian voter ID law, which intentionally discriminates against black and Latino Texans in violation of the Voting Rights Act, the court said. The law in question is revised version of earlier legislation that required residents to present one of seven accepted forms of identification at the polls in order to cast a ballot. The options included gun licenses and a variety of government-issued IDs (but not state university IDs), skewing in favor of IDs more likely to be held by whites.

After a federal court deemed the original law discriminatory, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the law’s language would need to be softened before it could pass muster. In June, the legislature passed a modified version that retained many of the restrictive requirements present in the original.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton responded to Wednesday’s ruling with a statement promising to appeal the lower court’s “outrageous” new decision. “The U.S. Department of Justice is satisfied the amended voter ID law has no discriminatory purpose or effect,” he said. “Safeguarding the integrity of elections in Texas is essential to preserving our democracy.”

Indeed, after Donald Trump was elected, the DOJ withdrew its Obama-era claim that Texas lawmakers had passed the bill with discriminatory intent. In July, the department filed a court document in support of the revised bill.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend