Trump Raises Russian Interference With Putin But Says It’s Time to Move On

The Russian view: Trump “accepted” Putin’s denial.

President Donald Trump speaks with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G20 Summit in Germany on Friday.Evan Vucci/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

President Donald Trump brought up Russian interference in the 2016 campaign with Russian President Vladimir Putin during their much-anticipated meeting on Friday at the G20 meeting in Germany, according to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. After Putin denied that Russia ran a covert operation to subvert the US election, Trump agreed to “move forward” and even to collaborate on cybersecurity, said Tillerson, who had been in the room. But Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who also attended the meeting, claimed that Trump accepted Putin’s assertion that Russia didn’t meddle in the election.

Trump “pressed [Putin] and then felt like at this point, ‘let’s talk about how to move forward,’” Tillerson told reporters after the meeting. He noted that Trump and Putin discussed the “challenges of cybersecurity” and agreed to set up a working group to develop an agreement that would allow the countries “to better understand how to deal with cybersecurity.” Trump and Putin, the secretary said, also “agreed to exchange further work regarding commitments” that Russia will not interfere in future elections in the United States and elsewhere. But Tillerson repeatedly noted that Trump had agreed put aside the issue of Moscow’s meddling in American democracy. “The question is what do we do now,” he said. In his account, Trump presented no warning to Putin regarding Russia’s information warfare against the United States. 

Meanwhile, US officials disputed Lavrov’s statement that Trump had accepted Putin’s claim Russia had nothing to do with interference in the US election. In his own press conference, Lavrov also said Trump told Putin “that in the US, as before, some groups are spreading—but can’t prove—the topic of Russian meddling in the US election.” Tillerson did not recount any such statement being made, but the sentiment of this alleged Trump remark certainly is in sync with what he has previously said publicly, suggesting the Trump-Russia scandal is a “hoax” and “fake news.”

US intelligence agencies agree that Putin oversaw a concerted Russian effort to interfere in the 2016 election in order to help Trump defeat Hillary Clinton. Russian-backed hackers broke into email accounts of Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign officials and then used Wikileaks to release emails designed to damage Clinton, the agencies concluded. Russians also created fake social media accounts to support Trump’s messaging and probed local election systems in at least 21 states, US officials say.

Trump has waffled on whether he accepts these conclusions, even as he faults former President Barack Obama for failing to do more to prevent Russian hacking.

Tillerson said Friday that Trump in his meeting with Putin “raised the concerns of the American people regarding Russian interference” in the election. That suggests that Trump did not personally endorse the view that Russia interfered.

Whatever Trump said on this front, it didn’t upset Putin. “The two leaders, I would say, connected very quickly,” Tillerson said. “There was a very clear positive chemistry between the two.” He added, “There was not a lot of relitigating of the past.”

Additional reporting by Hannah Levintova and Ashley Dejean.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend