Trump Says His False Threat of “Tapes” Was Designed to Pressure Comey

”I think his story may have changed.”

President Donald Trump offered a curious defense for publishing a tweet last month that suggested the existence of secret “tapes” of his private conversations with former FBI Director James Comey. On Thursday, the same day he admitted there were no tapes, he told Fox & Friends that he issued the false threat in order to influence Comey’s testimony in the hearings on Russian interference in the 2016 election. 

“When he found out that there may be tapes out there, whether it’s governmental tapes or anything else, I think his story may have changed,” Trump said in an interview that aired Friday morning. “You’ll have to take a look at that, because then he has to tell what actually took place at the events.”

“That was a smart way to make sure he stayed honest in his hearings,” Fox’s Ainsley Earhardt said.

“Well, it wasn’t very stupid, I can tell you that,” Trump responded.

Trump’s admission on Thursday that he never made or possessed any such recordings appeared to acknowledge that he purposely misled the public. Some legal experts, including the former ethics czar under the Obama administration, have since likened Trump’s stunt to intimidating a witness. 

It was Trump’s firing of Comey that led to the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller to investigate Russia’s interference in the election and possible ties between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin. Mueller’s probe is said to have recently been expanded to include an examination of whether Trump attempted to obstruct justice by sacking Comey.

In the same Fox & Friends interview Thursday, Trump hinted at his annoyance regarding Mueller and Comey’s close relationship, calling their friendship “very bothersome.” He declined to say whether Mueller should consider recusing himself from the special probe.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend