Republicans’ Only Selling Point for Their Obamacare Replacement Bill Is How Short It Is

The return of the dumbest talking point ever.


Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Amid a mounting revolt over House Republicans’ plan to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, the Trump administration is pointing to the literal length of the proposal as a major selling point. The GOP bill is just 123 pages long—substantially shorter than the current health care law. According to the administration, this makes it less onerous than Obamacare and, somehow, better for American patients.

“Look at the size: This is the Democrats; this is us. You can’t get any clearer in terms of: ‘This is government, this is not.'”

Republicans have been complaining about the number of pages in Obama’s health care reform bills ever since they were first introduced back in 2009. This curious line of argument reemerged on Tuesday at a White House press briefing, when the two pieces of legislation—Obamacare and the GOP replacement plan—were prominently displayed alongside each other for the purpose of emphasizing the difference in length.

“Look at the size: This is the Democrats; this is us,” White House press secretary Sean Spicer said, pointing to the two stacks of paper. “You can’t get any clearer in terms of: ‘This is government, this is not.’ Part of the reason the visual is important is that when you actually look at the difference, you realize this is what big government does. It crowds out competition, it drives up prices, it stifles entrepreneurship and innovation.”

Earlier in the briefing, Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price also underscored the physical differences.

“Notice how thick that is,” Price said, pointing at the Obamacare legislation.

Price added, “What it means is that we are making certain that the process, that the decisions that are going to be made are not going to be made by the federal government. They are going to be made by patients, families, and doctors.”

In some ways, the small-bill talking point is fitting for President Donald Trump, who prefers to keep his intelligence briefings short, uncomplicated, and supportive of his own preconceptions.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend