Spicer Claims Scandal-Plagued Trump Campaign Chair “Played a Very Limited Role”

His comments came in response to new questions about Trump-Russia ties.

Carlo Allegri/ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

While the directors of the FBI and the NSA were testifying before Congress about Russian meddling in the presidential election, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer offered some curious spin on the ties between Russia and associates of President Donald Trump.

In a press briefing, Spicer said that Paul Manafort, who performed controversial work for pro-Russian Ukrainian politicians from 2007 to 2012, “played a very limited role [on the Trump campaign] for a very limited amount of time.”

In fact, Manafort was involved with the campaign from March to August 2016 and served as campaign chairman starting in June, after campaign manager Corey Lewandowski was fired. He resigned in August after the New York Times reported on his ties to Russia. After he resigned, Trump’s son Eric called him “amazing,” and Trump himself thanked Manafort for “his great work in helping us to get where we are today, and in particular his work guiding us through the delegate and convention process.”

Even after his resignation, Manafort was reportedly “heavily involved with staffing” Trump’s incoming administration. The Daily Beast reported that he was talking to Trump every day during the transition.

Spicer also tried to downplay some of the other contacts between Trump associates and Russian officials. “There was a discussion, I heard some names [thrown] around before, that were hangers-on around the campaign,” Spicer said. “At some point, people that got thrown around at the beginning of this hearing, some of those names, the greatest amount of interaction that they’ve had is have cease-and-desist letters sent to them.” In response to a subsequent question, Spicer said he was referring to Roger Stone and Carter Page. Stone is a longtime informal Trump adviser who remains an ardent Trump booster and claimed a legal back channel to WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange. Page was an unpaid foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign who had extensive ties to Russia and met with Russian officials.

Spicer also seemed to downplay the role that retired Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn played in the campaign, referring to him as a “volunteer.” Flynn was one of Trump’s key national security advisers during the campaign and was reportedly one of several people Trump brought along to national security briefings he received in the run-up to the election. Flynn was reportedly a “regular presence” at Trump campaign events and was on the short list for vice president. Trump named Flynn national security adviser after he took office. Flynn lasted just 24 days before he was forced to resign after it was revealed that he misled Vice President Mike Pence about his communications the Russian ambassador to the US during the transition period.

Later in the briefing, Spicer said that he wasn’t “dismissing Paul Manafort as a hanger-on,” but he added, “For the entire final stretch of the general election, he was not involved. So to start to look at some individual that was there for a short period of time or, separately, individuals who really didn’t play any role in the campaign, and to suggest that those are the basis for anything, is a bit ridiculous.”

This post has been updated.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend