Paul Ryan: We’ve Been Dreaming of Slashing Medicaid Since My Kegger Days


Paul Ryan has been dreaming about cutting Medicaid for a long time—apparently ever since he was drinking at DC keg parties.

National Review editor Rich Lowry interviewed Ryan at a live event on Friday about the Republican plan to repeal and replace Obamacare. “We have a littler personal history that Paul may have forgotten,” Lowry told the audience at the start of the half-hour exchange. He recalled that in 1997, when he was selected to lead the magazine at the age of 29, his Washington, DC, housemates threw a kegger in his honor. Ryan attended, though the future House speaker “made a prudently early exit,” Lowry said. Ryan would have been about 27 at the time—he ran for office soon after, and was elected to his Wisconsin congressional seat the following year.

Later in the interview, Ryan discussed the GOP’s efforts to reduce government spending on health care, specifically the party’s plans to alter Medicaid (the main health insurance program for the poor) by giving the states more control and “capping” the program’s rate of growth. “We’ve been dreaming of this since I’ve been around—since you and I were drinking at a keg,” he told Lowry. The remark drew loud laughter from the crowd.

According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, 24 million fewer Americans would have health coverage by 2026 under the Republican bill than would under Obamacare. One of the specific policies Ryan mentioned—putting a cap on the amount of Medicaid money the federal government contributes to any given state—would almost certainly contribute to the decline in coverage. According to the CBO, states would likely be forced to engage in some combination of cutting payments to providers and health plans, eliminating some services, restricting Medicaid eligibility and, “to the extent feasible,” devising more efficient ways to run the program.

Ryan’s comments were first reported by Politico’s Adam Cancryn.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend