McCain Says Pressure for an Independent Trump-Russia Commission Is Growing

The Republican senator compared this situation to the aftermath of 9/11.

Cliff Owen/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) on Thursday called for an independent commission to investigate Russian interference in the presidential election, comparing the current situation to the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, when his initial requests for an independent commission were blocked but then gained steam.

“Back after 9/11, Sen. [Joe] Lieberman and I said we ought to have a select commission, and nobody wanted it, and then eventually it happened,” McCain told reporters in the Capitol. “The pressure will grow, particularly in light of the events of the last 24 hours.”

McCain was referring to the actions of Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, who drew criticism Wednesday for telling the press and President Donald Trump that the intelligence community may have unintentionally collected communications by Trump and his aides during the transition. Nunes did so without consulting his colleagues on the committee, and he may have disclosed classified information. His move has led Democrats and others to question his ability to oversee his committee’s investigation of the Trump-Russia scandal and Moscow’s hacking of the 2016 campaign. Nunes’ actions, McCain said, are “another reason for a select committee.” (A select committee is a special panel established by Congress to investigate a particular matter. Such a committee might have more independence and function in a more bipartisan manner than a traditional committee. It differs from a select commission, whose members are chosen by congressional leaders of both parties and the president and which operates outside the congressional system.)

Nunes apologized to his colleagues on Thursday. But criticism continued to mount. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is also investigating Russian interference in the 2016 elections, told reporters in the Capitol, “Not telling his members and briefing the president does not meet my definition of doing textbook, bipartisan oversight.”

“I think the actions of the House chair yesterday certainly call into question the ability of that committee to perform an independent investigation,” Sen. Angus King (I-Maine), another member of the intelligence committee, told Mother Jones. “But I don’t think that applies to the Senate committee. So far we are working on a bipartisan basis and I think we can get to the bottom of this.”

He added, “If we can’t, I’ll say so.”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest