Tillerson Disagrees With Trump on Nearly Everything

“These suggest some tensions with the president-elect.”

Christy Bowe/Globe Photos via ZUMA Wire

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


By the time the first day of hearings for Donald Trump’s secretary-of-state pick concluded, Rex Tillerson had expressed a range of opinions at odds with those of his future boss. As Sen. Christopher Coons (D-Del.) noted, Tillerson’s views on Muslims, Russian aggression, Saudi Arabia, NATO, the Paris climate agreement, the Iran nuclear deal, nuclear arms, and more were notably different from Trump’s campaign statements.

“All of these to me are quite encouraging,” Coons said. “But these suggest some tensions with the president-elect.”

Asked about how he’d resolve these differences with Trump’s stated views, Tillerson said:

“One of the reasons I came to the conclusion…to say yes to President-elect Trump when he asked me to do this, is that [in] my conversations with him on the subjects we have discussed…he’s been very open and inviting of hearing my views and respectful of those views. In terms of my categorizing it as my pushing back on him, my sense is we’re going to have all the views presented [at the] table and everyone will have an opportunity to express those and make the case. And the president decides.”

Throughout the hearing, the former Exxon Mobil CEO said he had not been briefed, examined the evidence, or received proper security clearances in order to answer questions on a range of international policy issues.

Coons wasn’t the only senator to note the contrast with Trump. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) observed, “Many of these statements have been undercut by earlier statements by the president-elect.”

Earlier in the day, Shaheen asked Tillerson if he would be willing to divest from Exxon Mobil stock. Tillerson replied that he would. She noted yet another difference with Trump—this one in his approach to his holdings. “I’m sad to say, it stands in stark contrast to what Trump had to say today,” she said. “That he’s not going to divest from his vast interests around the world?.”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest