Republicans Change Rules to Break Boycott and Approve Trump’s Treasury and Health Nominees

“We took some unprecedented actions today due to the unprecedented action on the part of our colleagues.”

Steven Mnuchin at his Senate hearingJoshua Roberts/Reuters/ZUMA

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Update 2/1/16: Early Wednesday morning, the Republicans on the Finance Committee reconvened to approve Mnuchin and Price. The Democrats were still boycotting, but Republicans rewrote the committee’s rules to proceed on the confirmation votes without needing any minority members present. “We took some unprecedented actions today due to the unprecedented action on the part of our colleagues,” Hatch said. “As I noted earlier, the Senate Finance Committee has been able to function even in the most divisive political environments. That all changed yesterday.”

After years of obstruction from Republicans in Congress, Senate Democrats have decided to play the same game. A panel of Senate Democrats unexpectedly boycotted a committee hearing Tuesday morning in an attempt to derail two of President Donald Trump’s most prominent Cabinet nominations.

The Senate Finance Committee was scheduled to vote on two of Trump’s Cabinet nominees Tuesday morning: Steven Mnuchin for treasury secretary and Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) for health and human services secretary. But the Democrats on the committee banded together in a boycott, and not a single one of them showed up. According to committee rules, at least one member of the minority party needs to be present in order to form a quorum to record a vote.

The committee’s Republican chairman, Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, was incensed. “This is the most pathetic thing I’ve seen in my time,” he said. That sentiment represents a reversal from Hatch on whether presidential nominees deserve a committee vote. When a seat on the Supreme Court opened last year following Antonin Scalia’s death, Hatch cited Merrick Garland as the sort of judge he could see the Senate confirming. When President Barack Obama in fact nominated Garland, less than a week after Hatch’s comment, the senator changed his tune and joined the rest of the GOP caucus in refusing even to consider Garland’s nomination. 

Democrats have vehemently objected to both Price and Mnuchin. Trump’s health pick has been plagued by ethics allegations that he used his office to pen legislation that benefited his personal stock investments. And Mnuchin lied during his confirmation about his bank using robo-signing for foreclosures. Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, the ranking Democrat on the committee, took to Twitter to explain the boycott of both nominees:

Hatch closed Tuesday’s hearing by saying he hoped Democrats would return and sit down to take a vote, but he didn’t offer a timeline for when this stalemate might end.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend