Justice Department Deploys Hundreds of Poll Watchers to Protect Voters

“The bedrock of our democracy is the right to vote.”

Gerry Broome/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

The Justice Department announced in July that due to the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision gutting several sections of the Voting Rights Act, it had to slash its number of election day poll monitors to just a handful of observers in five states. On Monday morning, the department reversed this decision, announcing that it will deploy more than 500 election monitors to 67 jurisdictions in 28 states. This brings the Justice Department’s election-monitoring capacity nearly back up to 2012 levels, when it sent more than 780 observers to 23 states.

“The bedrock of our democracy is the right to vote, and the Department of Justice works tirelessly to uphold that right not only on Election Day, but every day,” said Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch in a statement. “The department is deeply committed to the fair and unbiased application of our voting rights laws and we will work tirelessly to ensure that every eligible person that wants to do so is able to cast a ballot.”

The election observers will be keeping an eye on whether voters are subject to different voting procedures “on the basis of race, color or membership in a language minority group,” whether counties are complying with provisions of the Voting Rights Act relating to foreign languages, and whether jurisdictions are properly providing access to voters with disabilities.

Several of the areas where the Justice Department is sending election monitors have already seen reports of voting problems. The department announced it will be sending monitors to three counties in Ohio, a state where the Trump campaign’s voter intimidation tactics are already the subject of a lawsuit that is now before the US Supreme Court. The Justice Department said it will also send monitors to Harris County, Texas, where some areas have had reports of poll workers incorrectly telling people that a voter ID is required.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend