The Richest Man in Congress Held on to His Seat—Barely

After embracing Trump, California Rep. Darrell Issa enjoyed a narrow victory.

Rep. Darrell Issa returning to the House Oversight Committee's offices in June 2013.Cliff Owen/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

For the first time, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) had to work to keep his seat. On Tuesday, he eked out a narrow victory against his Democratic challenger, Doug Applegate, beating him 51 to 49. 

Even as Donald Trump sailed to victory, he may have helped weaken Issa’s grip on California’s 49th district, where the wealthiest member of Congress has served effectively unchallenged for 16 years. Back in February, Issa warned that Trump could have a toxic effect on down-ballot Republicans seeking reelection. Issa even suggested that Trump could be “a national Todd Akin” for the wider Republican Party. Then, against his own advice, he embraced The Donald and joined Trump’s national security advisory board on the same day that the world heard Trump bragging about grabbing women “by the pussy.”

In his seven previous elections, Issa didn’t even have to put out yard signs, so safely insulated was he in the Republican-leaning district that spans northern San Diego County and southern Orange County, an expanse of golden sand beaches and coastal bluffs that has long been the realm of highly educated, well-off white people. “Darrell never participated before. He’s never been involved in our Republican campaigning, because he was so safe,” Republican Oceanside Councilman Jerry Kern told me earlier this month.

Issa  joined Trump’s national security advisory board on the same day that the world heard Trump bragging about grabbing women “by the pussy.”

But redistricting in 2012 and a growing Latino population has slowly pulled the region leftward. In this ridiculous election year, Trump left plenty of the area’s Republicans without a top-of-the-ticket contender to rally behind. An August poll found that Trump had a 60 percent unfavorable rating in Issa’s district. Another showed Hillary Clinton with a 14-point lead. Yet Jason Roe, a San Diego-based political consultant, said he was skeptical of Trump’s threat to candidates like Issa. “Do people vote based on that? I don’t think voters are holding down-ballot Republicans accountable for Trump,” he said.

Applegate came out of nowhere to trail Issa by just five points in the June primary. It could have been a wake-up call, but the message didn’t seem to reach Team Issa. His campaign was described as “mystifyingly bad” and incredibly slow. “It’s being run like a 1980s campaign,” Francine Busby, the chair of the San Diego Democratic Party, told me in late October. “He hasn’t been visible and active.” The campaign didn’t start running ads until October. One political operative described them as “the worst fucking TV ads I’ve ever seen in my life.”

In the few weeks running up to the election, Issa suddenly went into full campaign mode. He rode his bicycle throughout the district, stopping for photo ops; he attended private fundraisers and visited a food bank and the Camp Pendleton Marine Base. One thing he never did, however, was withdraw his support for Trump. And that decision has paid off. “You gotta remember: Darrell outdid Romney in the district,” Oceanside Councilman Jerry Kern told me. “I’m sure he’ll outdo Trump this time.” Sure enough, Trump took just 39 percent of the vote in San Diego County and 44 percent in Orange County.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend