Trump: I’ll Respect Election Results—”If I Win”

The GOP nominee says he is reserving his “right to contest or file a legal challenge in the event of a questionable result.”

The morning after he refused to promise he would accept the results of next month’s election, GOP nominee Donald Trump continued to stoke fears of a “rigged” election during a speech at an Ohio rally.

“I will totally accept the results of this great and historic presidential election—if I win,” he said, drawing cheers from the crowd.

Trump rattled off statistics from a 2012 Pew Charitable Trusts study finding that voter registration systems are “plagued with errors and inefficiencies.” He cited the report as evidence that millions of people are committing voter fraud to help Hillary Clinton. The report does not make that argument, and voting experts say that voter fraud is exceedingly rare.

But Trump also attempted to legitimize his statement at last night’s debate. He told the crowd that his claim that he would “look at [results] at the time” before deciding whether to accept them was akin to Al Gore’s contesting of the vote in Florida in 2000. (It’s not.) “I’m being asked to waive centuries of legal precedent designed to protect the voters” by committing to accept the election outcome, he claimed. He also said he would “respect a clear result, but also I would also reserve my right to contest or file a legal challenge in the event of a questionable result.” What constitutes a questionable result was left unmentioned.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend