If You Want Time Off When You Have a Baby, Don’t Live in These States

The US still doesn’t take paid family leave seriously.

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/g/Halfpoint">Halfpoint</a>/Shutterstock

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

In the United States, 23 percent of new mothers are back in the office within two weeks of childbirth, not because they want to but because the United States has no comprehensive policy for paid family leave.

Instead, family leave is determined by individual states, and a new report by the National Partnership for Women & Families, an advocacy group that promotes “fairness in the workplace,” paints a grim picture of the patchwork of policies across the country. It graded individual states on their family leave policies and 27 scored a D or an F. According to Vicki Shabo, vice president at National Partnership, these states “have done very little or nothing at all beyond the very basic protections federal law offers when it comes to providing leave, providing pregnancy accommodations or helping nursing mothers in the workplace.” 

The report was created by using a point system to tally up which states have the most progressive policies for both workers in the private sector and state workers. States received points for laws that accommodate working pregnant women or breastfeeding women, flexible sick leave, and job-protected paid family leave.

“No state is really doing enough to help working parents and provide the baseline of support that working parents need,” Shabo says. “Particularly at a time when the issues of working families and how to create a sustainable, equitable economy and society are really front and center.”

The report notes that the United States is the only economically advanced nation that fails to guarantee maternity leave—paid or unpaid. According to the International Labor Organization, 183 countries guarantee paid maternity leave and 79 guarantee paid paternity leave.

There are a few bright spots. California received the highest score for the first-of-its-kind paid family leave law, which allows people earning close to minimum wage to be paid 70 percent of their salary while on leave, while workers who earn up to $108,000 annually will get 60 percent of their salary during leave. Another law on the books mandates no less than one hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked. But the authors of the report added that even California has room for improvement; there’s no law protecting job security in the case of necessary leave. New York, which guarantees 12 weeks of paid leave, and the District of Columbia, where workers can take up to 16 weeks of leave over two years, scored the second highest with an A-.

But these are the exceptions; 12 states scored an F, meaning lawmakers enacted no laws guaranteeing any maternal or family leave before or after a new child is born, adopted, or fostered.













The report also points out the disparity between white families and people of color when it comes to family leave. Under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act, a law that protects jobs if leave is necessary, only 59 percent of the total workforce—and 56 percent of the private-sector workforce—are covered. The report explains, “In the private sector, workers are excluded because the FMLA only applies to employees in workplaces with 50 or more workers within a 75-mile radius. Even in covered workplaces, workers must have worked for their employer for at least a year and worked at least 1,250 hours during the previous year to be eligible.” The data also showed that only 25 percent of Hispanic working parents and 35 percent of African American working parents are eligible and can afford to take that leave, compared with 43 percent of working white parents.

The report also documents strong bipartisan support for increased paid family leave policies. Research showed that 96 percent of Democrats, 74 percent of independents, and 73 percent of Republicans polled identified implementing new laws for paid sick days and paid family and medical leave as “very important.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend