The Obama Administration Is Still Targeting the Immigrants It Said It Wouldn’t Target

New government data shows enforcement in the field doesn’t match official policy.

<a href="">Peggy Peattie</a>/San Diego Union-Tribune via ZUMA /20160524_zaf_s44_008.jpg?type=hires

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Two years ago, the Department of Homeland Security announced that it would look to deport only those undocumented immigrants who had committed serious crimes. Instead of targeting immigrants who posed little to no threat to public safety, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson directed ICE officials to focus their enforcement efforts on immigrants who had committed a felony or several misdemeanor offenses. 

As part of its new program, known as the Priority Enforcement Program, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement also planned to limit how often it asked local law enforcement to hold immigrants beyond their release dates. That type of request, known as a detainer request, has been criticized as a violation of the Fourth Amendment.

But government data obtained this week by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University reveals that ICE field officers have largely ignored those orders, continuing to target low-level offenders and immigrants who have never committed a crime. In the first two months of 2016, for example, more than half the detainer requests targeted immigrants with no criminal conviction. That’s actually an increase under the new program. Of those who did have a criminal conviction, drunk driving was the most common charge, and traffic offenses rank among the top five.

ICE spokeswoman Sarah Rodriquez told the Guardian that the agency could not comment on an analysis by an outside organization, but she said the agency continues to “make significant strides” in focusing its enforcement efforts on convicted criminals and people who pose a threat to public safety and national security.

You can read the full TRAC report here.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend