The Number of Syrian Refugees Coming to the US Just Shot Up

After a slow start to the resettlement program, there’s been a surge.

<a href="">VIPDesignUSA</a>/iStock

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

After a slow start, the Obama Administration is more than halfway to its goal of admitting 10,000 Syrian refugees by the end of September. The number of Syrian refugees who have resettled in the United States rose significantly in May and June, bringing the total to 5,186 since October 2015. If refugees continue to be processed and admitted at the current rate, the target could be met by the end of the summer.

Syrian refugees resettled in United States

In the first seven months after Secretary of State John Kerry announced the plan to bring in 10,000 Syrian refugees last September, only a few hundred trickled in each month. After six months, fewer than 1,300 had entered the country. In May, the nonprofit Human Rights First issued a statement saying the United States was “alarmingly behind” in meeting its goal. Twenty-seven Senate Democrats wrote to President Obama saying they were “deeply concerned” by the slow pace of resettlement, noting that Canada had already admitted more than 26,000 Syrians.

However, by the time the senators criticized the delay, efforts to speed up refugee screening were already under way. The State Department and Department of Homeland Security worked to increase their staffing levels in Jordan, which currently hosts about 660,000 Syrian refugees. Normally, DHS sends teams of 13 to Amman every few months. But from February to April, it sent 40-person teams to interview and fingerprint asylum seekers. The State Department also rented a facility in Amman to accommodate extra staff members.

At the same time, smaller efforts were underway in Turkey and Lebanon, which have taken in 2.7 million and more than 1 million Syrians, respectively. DHS has been sending teams of 15 to 20 people to Turkey. In Lebanon, the United States resumed screening asylum seekers after a two-year hiatus. However, the refugee screening efforts have been notoriously slow. For security reasons, US government employees in Lebanon must live and work inside the embassy, which can only accommodate five DHS staff at a time.

Still, the overall pace of screening efforts has been on the rise. Before the DHS staffing surge, 3,500 Syrians were interviewed between October and December. Between January and March, more than 9,000 Syrians were interviewed. A spokesman for the State Department told Mother Jones that he expects the rate of arrivals to increase through the end of this fiscal year.

However, even if the United States meets its goal of admitting 10,000 Syrian refugees, that will help only two percent of the total number of Syrians in need of resettlement. Oxfam has estimated that based on the size of its economy, the United States should accept 160,000 Syrian refugees. If the United States can meet its moderate goal of accepting 10,000 Syrian refugees this year, it may signal that the administration will raise the threshold for the rest of 2016 and 2017.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend