Hillary Clinton Blasts Trump’s “Dangerous” Foreign Policy

Thursday’s speech was her sharpest attack yet on the presumptive GOP nominee.

John Locher/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Hillary Clinton launched her toughest attack yet on Donald Trump in a foreign policy speech in San Diego, California, on Thursday, attacking the presumptive Republican presidential nominee as an ignorant and dangerous figure whose election would be a “historic mistake.”

“I believe the person the Republicans have nominated for president cannot do the job,” she said. “I believe he will take our country down a truly dangerous path.”

Clinton mocked Trump’s volatile temper, name-calling, and penchant for fighting on Twitter. “It’s not hard to imagine Donald Trump leading us into a war just because someone got under his very thin skin,” she told her audience, which laughed frequently as Clinton ticked off her complaints about Trump. “We cannot put the security of our children and grandchildren in Donald Trump’s hands.”

The former secretary of state also ran down a long list of controversial and sometimes illegal foreign policy and defense stances Trump supports. In addition to his proposed ban on Muslim immigration, he has suggested breaking up NATO and other long-standing alliances if the United States isn’t better compensated, bringing back torture, and targeting the families of terrorists. Clinton attacked him for all those proposals, adding that Trump could spark an economic disaster and highlighting his friendliness for Vladimir Putin and other authoritarian leaders.

“Donald Trump’s ideas aren’t just different—they’re dangerously incoherent,” Clinton said. “They’re not even really ideas, just a series of bizarre rants, personal feuds, and outright lies.”

Although Clinton spoke about her own foreign policy experience and plans, most of the speech focused on Trump. The overriding theme was what Clinton called a “choice between a fearful America that’s less secure and less engaged with the world, and a strong, confident America that leads, to keep our country safe and our economy growing.”

Trump’s statements and proposals on foreign policy have prompted near-universal horror from diplomats, military officers, intelligence officials, and analysts—including some Republicans. A group of more than 75 Republican foreign policy experts blasted Trump in an open letter last month, saying he was “fundamentally dishonest” and “utterly unfitted” to be president. CIA Director John Brennan said he would refuse any orders to resume waterboarding or other acts of torture. Marine General Joe Dunford, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, attacked torture as “inconsistent with the values of our nation” in response to Trump’s comments. The Huffington Post also wrote in April that there was panic among current and former military officers at the prospect of a Trump presidency.

For his part, Trump attacked Clinton on Wednesday night, claiming he had received an advance copy of her speech that was filled with “lies about my foreign policy” and falsely claiming he had never been open to Japan obtaining nuclear weapons. He also mocked Clinton on Twitter while she was speaking:


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend