Abortion Foes Finally Find a Reason to Hate Merrick Garland

Obama’s Supreme Court nominee once praised the release of the papers of the author of Roe v. Wade.

Supreme Court nominee Merrick GarlandAP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

For the past 25 years, Supreme Court nomination battles have often been proxy skirmishes in the culture wars, particularly over abortion, which has been a litmus test for any potential court nominee. But with his appointment of DC Circuit Chief Judge Merrick Garland to fill the seat of the late Justice Antonin Scalia, President Barack Obama has left the anti-abortion foes a bit stymied.

That’s because the DC Circuit, where Garland has served for the past 19 years, almost never ends up on the frontlines of the culture wars; cases involving abortion or gay marriage rarely appear on its docket, which is heavily weighted with regulatory issues. And as someone who spent most of his pre-judicial career as a federal prosecutor, Garland hasn’t had many opportunities to weigh in on Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion. Despite having gone through the judicial confirmation process once before, and having been vetted for the Supreme Court in 2010, his record on the subject appears to be almost entirely blank. So the anti-abortion groups that have played such a huge role in prior court nomination fights have been struggling to find a really good reason to oppose him, aside from the fact that he was chosen by Obama.

Finally, one of those groups appears to have hit the opposition-research jackpot. Americans United for Life, which refers to itself as “the nation’s premier pro-life legal team,” today sent out a press release reiterating its opposition to the Senate holding confirmation hearings on any of Obama’s Supreme Court nominees this year. Garland is “Obama’s pro-abortion pick,” the group asserted.

As evidence for its position, AUL points to this little bit of unconvincing evidence: Apparently, Garland once spoke at a gathering celebrating the 2005 release of a book on the late Justice Harry Blackmun by veteran New York Times Supreme Court reporter Linda Greenhouse. After Blackmun’s death, Greenhouse had drawn heavily on the release of a huge treasure trove of Blackmun’s papers—papers Garland called “a great gift to the country.” Blackmun was the author of Roe v. Wade.

That’s it.

Acting AUL President Clarke Forsythe promised to help disseminate more such incriminating information to help the Senate decide what to do with Garland’s nomination. “Americans United for Life looks forward to assisting the Senate leadership in evaluating prospective nominees when the time is right,” he said.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend