ISIS Claims Responsibility for Baghdad Mall Attack That Killed At Least 18 People

It was the largest attack to hit the city in months.

AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


ISIS has claimed responsibility for a major attack at a shopping mall in Baghdad on Monday that killed at least 18 people.

According to Reuters, ISIS said the attack at the Jawhara mall was specifically intended to kill Shiite Muslims. The mall is in a neighborhood called Baghdad al-Jadida that is home to mostly Shiites. The attack began with a car bomb blast at the entrance to the mall, then continued as several fighters shot their way into the mall and two of them detonated suicide vests. The attack, when combined with three other blasts that took place on Monday in other areas of Baghdad, was the largest to hit the city in months. No one has yet claimed responsibility for the other attacks.

While bombings aren’t rare in Iraq, Monday’s attack was unusually complex and potentially an ISIS attempt at revenge for the Iraqi Army’s recent battlefield successes. “The enemy is using new tactics because of our recent victories [against them] in Ramadi and other areas,” Lieutenant General Abdulameer al-Shimmari, the head of the Baghdad Operations Command, told the Washington Post.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest