Donald Trump Talks About San Bernardino Shooter (Corrected)

Mic Smith/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


CORRECTION: Others have pointed out that in this quote, Donald Trump said, “The wife probably radicalized him.” Given that this comment occurred during cross-talk, while he was on the phone, this seems to be a more accurate description of what he said. We apologize for the error.

A bizarre exchange occurred on MSNBC’s Morning Joe on Tuesday. Donald Trump was doing a phoner. Naturally, the big subject of the day was his unconstitutional, unworkable, and outrageous proposal to ban Muslims—including American Muslims traveling abroad—from entering the United States. And Trump was defending his idea (and praising Franklin D. Roosevelt’s internment of Japanese Americans). At one point, Trump said he hoped his ban “doesn’t take long,” but then he went on about the report that a deposit of $28,500 was made into the account of Syed Farook, the husband in the couple who mounted the San Bernardino attack last week. He said:

How many other checks were sent to people all over the country that had been radicalized? Nobody knew this guy was radicalized. I probably radicalized him.

I probably radicalized him? So was Trump suggesting that his own harsh anti-Muslim rhetoric had radicalized Farook? If so, that would seem to be an admission that his approach is counterproductive and dangerous. Yet Trump does not admit mistakes, right? If he did, that would be huge.

Journalist Mark Halperin, who was questioning Trump at the time, did not follow up regarding this comment. The Onion, though, foresaw this campaign moment with an article it published yesterday. The headline: “Trump Gives Muslim On Fence About Radicalizing Just The Push He Needed.”

You can watch Trump’s remark here:

The full interview is here.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest