Republicans’ First Question for Hillary Clinton at Today’s Benghazi Hearing Was Very Telling

They’re not just trying to blame for the attack but the entire Libya policy.

Benghazi Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, left, talks with the committee's ranking Democrat, Elijah Cummings, on October 22, 2015, prior to the start of the committee's hearing on Benghazi.Evan Vucci/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

The first Republican to grill Hillary Clinton at Thursday’s House Benghazi committee hearing did not ask about the attack at the US diplomatic compound or about problems of security there. Instead, he tried to establish another talking point that could be useful for Republicans in 2016: the then-secretary of state was responsible for the Obama administration’s decision to intervene in Libya in 2011 and, therefore, is to blame for the Benghazi attacks and everything else that has happened in that chaos-ridden country ever since.

Rep. Pete Roskam (R-Ill.) depicted Clinton as the main driver of President Barack Obama’s decision to intervene in Libya, crediting her with bringing both the White House and the international community on board. “There were senior voices within the White House that were opposed to military action—Vice President Biden, Department of Defense, Secretary Gates, the National Security Council, and so forth. But you persuaded President Obama to intervene militarily. Isn’t that right?”

When Clinton noted that a number of US allies were pressuring the Obama administration to take action, Roskam said, “I think you are underselling yourself.”

He continued:

So, to put this in totality, you were able to overcome opposition within the State Department. You were able to persuade the president. You were able to persuade the United Nations and the international community. You made the call to the Arabs and brought them home. You saw it. You drove it. You articulated it. And you persuaded people. Did I get that wrong?

Our Libya policy couldn’t have happened without you because you were its chief architect…After your plan, things in Libya today are a disaster.

It was a strange inquiry to begin with, and it seemed designed to fault Clinton for the entire Libya policy. Democrats on the Benghazi committee were quick to respond, blasting out an email noting that “the international community concluded that if it did not intervene, Qadhafi would slaughter thousands of Libyans.” The email noted that Republicans including Sens. John McCain and Marco Rubio agreed that action was needed.

Some reporters tweeted their bemusement at Roskam’s grilling of Clinton.

These opening questions had little to do with what happened at the Benghazi compound. But they sure could yield clips useful for a Republican attack ad.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend