Conservatives Slam Trump Over Support for Eminent Domain

The policy has allowed the real estate mogul to profit hugely.

GOP presidential front-runner Donald Trump has taken fire from the right for his lack of foreign policy experience, his immigration proposals, and his apparent eagerness to insult women. Now a conservative free-enterprise advocacy group has attacked him for his views on a more esoteric subject: eminent domain, long held up by conservatives as an example of government overreach.

The Club for Growth launched a $1 million ad buy in Iowa this week that in part attacks the real estate mogul on his support for the practice, in which the government is able to take private property for public use. “Trump supports eminent domain abuse,” the ad says. “Because he can make millions while we lose our property rights.”

The Trump campaign didn’t immediately respond to a request for comments on the ad. But Trump had already ridiculed the group publicly after he said it requested a large donation.

The group also launched an ad attacking Trump’s “very liberal” record on taxes, bailouts, and health care. But other conservatives have seized on its criticism of Trump’s position on eminent domain.

“[Trump’s support of eminent domain] strikes me as a potential serious weakness for Trump, as it’s just about impossible to square Trump’s view on the issue with conservatism, limited government, or, ahem, freedom and liberty,” wrote Jim Geraghty in the conservative National Review. “Has any Trump fan articulated an argument in favor of state and local governments claiming private property and turning it over to wealthy developers? Isn’t that just about the clearest case of big government run amok and crony capitalism?”

Trumps attempts to enlist government assistance in acquiring private property in order to expand his real estate empire is well documented. The most famous case came when he successfully convinced the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority to invoke eminent domain to seize the house of a widow in Atlantic City in order to build a parking lot for limousines at his casino.

After the US Supreme Court upheld an expansive view of eminent domain in 2005, Trump lauded the decision. “I happen to agree with it 100 percent,” he told Fox News’ Neil Cavuto in 2005. “Not that I would want to use it.” His rationale was that this was a simple case of doing what is best for the greatest number of people. He said,  “If you have a person living in an area that’s not even necessarily a good area, and government, whether it’s local or whatever, government wants to build a tremendous economic development, where a lot of people are going to be put to work and make [an] area that’s not good into a good area, and move the person that’s living there into a better place—now, I know it might not be their choice—but move the person to a better place and yet create thousands upon thousands of jobs and beautification and lots of other things, I think it happens to be good.”

And sometimes, it was also very good for Donald Trump.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend