The 5 Unmissable Moments From the Big GOP Showdown

Trump vs. Kelly, Rand vs. Christie, and Ben Carson on waterboarding.

Andrew Harnik/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

From Donald Trump to Rand Paul to Chris Christie to, well, Donald Trump, the first Republican primary debate of the season did not disappoint. So without further ado, here are the highlights from Thursday night’s Fox News debate, featuring the 10 leading candidates.

Donald Trump v. Megyn Kelly

At Thursday night’s debate, Fox News host Megyn Kelly and billionaire bombast Donald Trump went head-to-head. Early in the debate, Kelly, one of three moderators, questioned Trump on his record of making demeaning comments about women. “You’ve called women you don’t like ‘fat pigs, dogs, slobs, and disgusting animals,'” Kelly said. “Only Rosie O’Donnell,” Trump responded, prompting applause. “No, it wasn’t,” Kelly replied.

The exchange went downhill from there. Trump, being Trump, did not hold back: “Honestly Megyn, if you don’t like it, I’m sorry. I’ve been very nice to you, although I could probably maybe not be, based on the way you have treated me.”

Watch the exchange:

Rand Paul v. Chris Christie

The award for biggest spat of the night went to Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who engaged in a shouting match over the issue of government surveillance. Paul, who has been vocal about ending the government’s sweeping collection of Americans’ communications records, said that Christie doesn’t understand the Fourth Amendment and the Bill of Rights. Christie responded by invoking the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Rand Paul recalled that Christie once hugged President Obama—that post-Superstorm Sandy photo-op that still haunts Christie among some conservatives. Christie responded by pointing out that he had hugged victims of 9/11. It wasn’t pretty.

Trump takes credit for illegal immigration debate

Nevermind that Republicans have been at war with President Obama over immigration—and particularly the president’s executive orders granting deferred action to about 5 million undocumented immigrants. To Donald Trump, no one would be talking about undocumented immigrants if it weren’t for him. The GOP frontrunner claimed Thursday that if it weren’t for him—remember when he suggested that undocumented immigrants from Mexico are rapists?—no one would be discussing this hot-button issue.

“So, if it weren’t for me, you wouldn’t even be talking about illegal immigration, Chris,” he said to moderator Chris Wallace, who challenged Trump to back up his allegations that the Mexican government is sending its criminals over the border into the United States. Trump continued: “Our politicians are stupid. And the Mexican government is much smarter, much sharper, much more cunning. And they send the bad ones over because they don’t want to pay for them. They don’t want to take care of them…Why should they when the stupid leaders of the United States will do it for them? And that’s what is happening whether you like it or not.”

Trump explains why Hillary Clinton attended his wedding

Turns out, Trump paid the Democratic front-runner to attend his wedding. Explaining why he donated money to Democrats over the years, Trump said he was taking advantage of a “broken system” in which he gives money to politicians and gets favors in return. “When I need something from them two years later, three years later, I call them, they are there for me,” he said.

So what did he get from Hillary Clinton? “For Hillary Clinton, I said come to my wedding and she came to my wedding,” he said. “She had no choice because I gave.”

That’s a pretty expensive wedding guest.

Ben Carson is on board with waterboarding

Asked whether he would bring back the practice of waterboarding that the government employed on detainees under President George W. Bush, Carson—who was generally vague—seemed to say he would. “What we do in order to get the info that we need is our business. And I wouldn’t necessarily be broadcasting to everybody what we’re going to do,” Carson said during Thursday’s debate. “We’ve gotten into this mindset of fighting politically correct wars. There is no such thing as a politically correct war.”

“Believe me,” he added, “if we gave them the mission, which is what the commander-in-chief, if we don’t tie their hands behind their back, they’ll do it extremely effectively.”

Oh, and did he mention that he is “the only one to separate Siamese twins”? Yes, he did.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend