Texas Police Deny Editing Dashcam Footage of Sandra Bland’s Arrest

But big questions remain.

On the left, Sandra Bland is seen exiting her car after a routine traffic stop on July 10. Flowers, right, adorn a memorial for Bland near Prairie View A&M University, on Tuesday.Pat Sullivan/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

After Tuesday’s release of police dashcam footage capturing the arrest of Sandra Bland, the 28-year-old from Illinois who was found dead three days later in police custody, questions swirled on social media about apparent glitches and loops in the footage, and whether or not Bland should have been taken into custody in the first place.

A number of reports have now detailed the alleged cuts. In one section, for example, a man can be seen walking from a tow-truck towards the police cruiser. Seconds later, the footage is repeated, while the audio continues seemingly unbroken underneath.

Texas police have now told Mother Jones that the 52-minute video of Bland’s was not deliberately edited, and that the glitches were the result of a YouTube upload error. “Some of the video that occurred during this conversation was affected in the upload and is being addressed,” said Texas Department of Public Safety spokesman Tom Vinger, by email. He added that the agency asked the FBI to examine the footage to ensure its integrity, prior to the video’s release. (In a July 17 statement, DPS says that officials asked the FBI to “conduct a forensic analysis” of the footage.) He didn’t elaborate about the specific glitches, nor the apparent mismatch between audio and video.

In the video taken on July 10, a state Department of Public Safety trooper—later identified as Brian Encinia—can be seen approaching Bland’s Hyundai during a routine traffic stop. When Encinia asks Bland to put out her cigarette, she refuses, and the officer orders Bland to get out of her car. When Bland argues with the officer, Encinia opens Bland’s door, reaches in, and forces her out. Department of Public Safety Director Steven McCraw has admitted that Encinia violated department policy and had been reassigned to desk duty pending the investigation into Bland’s death.

Meanwhile, the dashcam video has raised further questions about whether or not Encinia’s conduct was lawful. Mother Jones has asked the Department of Public Safety for comment on the following questions, and will update this post when they respond:

  • Was Encinia’s conduct during the traffic stop, and eventual arrest of Bland, lawful? According to DPS, Bland was arrested for “assault on a public servant.” Encinia claimed that Bland had kicked him. In the video, Encinia told Bland she was under arrest before she stepped out of the car. Later, Encinia can be heard speaking to someone, saying that he attempted to de-escalate the situation before detaining Bland. He does not mention that he apparently threatened Bland with what appears to be a Taser, nor that he opened her door and forced her out of the car.
  • What about the other officers in the video? The video shows at least two other officers arriving at the scene. As Encinio is heard holding Bland down on the ground, Bland calls him a “pussy,” to which a female officer replies, “No, you are.” It is unclear whether the other officers assisted Encinio in the arrest, and whether they used force in the process.

According to the statement issued to Mother Jones, the Texas DPS is preparing to release a new version of the dashcam recording, presumably without the glitches in the video, and DVDs will be available to the media late Wednesday morning.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend