This Is the One Democrat Texas’ Voter ID Law Could Really Screw Over

The state’s new voting law could depress the non-white vote in Democrat Pete Gallego’s majority-minority district in southwestern Texas.

Rep. Pete Gallego (D-Tex.).Tom Reel/San Antonio Express-News/ZUMAPress

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

The only competitive congressional race in Texas this year pits incumbent Democratic Rep. Pete Gallego against Republican William Hurd in the massive 23rd district, which stretches across the entire southwestern part of the state. It’s also the race most likely to be affected by Texas’ strict new voter ID law. That’s bad news for Gallego.

Texas’ new voting law requires that voters provide an approved form of government-issued photo identification before casting a ballot. Minority voters, who tend to vote Democratic, are less likely to have a government-issued ID. The 23rd district is 70 percent Latino. “That has to benefit Hurd slightly and hurt Gallego slightly,” Mark Jones, chairman of the Rice University Political Science Department, told the El Paso Times in mid-October.

Gallego told the Times last month that he expected some people to be prevented from voting because of the new law: “If one voter gets turned away from the polls, that’s one voter too many.”

On election day, though, Gallego’s campaign was more upbeat. “We spent months both communicating with potential voters about the voter ID law as well as training organizers to be able to educate Texans on what they need to bring with them to the polls,” a spokesman for the campaign told Mother Jones Tuesday. “We’re hopeful that voters will be able to participate in the process and have their voices heard today.”

The race in the 23rd district is the most closely watched in the state, with a combined total of about $6 million spent so far by the campaigns.

Last month, a federal trial court struck down Texas’ voting law, ruling that it overly burdened minority voters, and as such violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act. But two days before early voting began, the Supreme Court upheld the law. More than 600,000 registered voters in Texas who lack appropriate ID could be affected by the new rules.

Republicans in the Texas legislature had first introduced the voter ID law in 2011, but the state wasn’t able to enact the measure until 2013, after the Supreme Court had struck down the part of the Voting Rights Act that required certain states, such as Texas, that have a history of discriminating against minority voters to get approval from the federal government before implementing new voting restrictions.

It’s hard to tell if the law has already kept voters from the polls. In the early voting period that ended October 31st, 1,715,731 total votes had been cast. That’s down from 1,731,589 over the same time period during the 2010 midterm elections.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend