California Passes Domestic Worker Bill of Rights, Sort Of

<a href="https://twitter.com/JerryBrownGov/status/383317335567659008/photo/1">Calif. Governor's Office</a>/Twitter

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law the California Domestic Worker Bill of Rights yesterday, making California only the third state in the country to adopt such legislation. But despite its celebration as a policy victory by advocates, the law might more aptly be called the California Domestic Worker Bill of Right, after it was watered down to only include overtime protections.

The law now reads that a domestic work employee “shall not be employed more than nine hours in any workday or more than 45 hours in any workweek unless the employee receives one and one-half times the employee’s regular rate of pay” for all overtime hours worked. Hour protections are, without a doubt, an important gain for domestic workers, who “are prone to be overworked on a weekly and daily basis,” according to Sarah Leberstein, an attorney at the National Employment Law Project.

But lost in the legislative process were a number of protections, including:

  • the right of live-in employees to eight hours of uninterrupted sleep;
  • the right of live-in employees to “adequate, decent, and sanitary” sleeping accommodations;
  • the right to meal and rest breaks;
  • and the right to paid days of rest after one year of work with an employer.

(The signed bill also includes a sunset, stipulating that a committee reviews the bill before January 2017.)

Even though the California bill doesn’t measure up to, say, New York’s 2010 bill of rights—which provides paid days of rest and protections for domestic workers who suffer sexual or racial harassment—Leberstein argues that it is still an important symbolic win: “It shows that domestic workers are on a roll, that there’s growing recognition that this work is really crucial and absolutely needs the basic protections that other workers have. It shows that there’s momentum.”

Don’t get us wrong: Overtime pay is huge. It just doesn’t go far enough.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest