Latest GOP Meme: Obama Can’t Be Trusted On Syria Because…#Benghazi

The caskets of US Ambassador to Libya J. Christopher Stevens, Foreign Service officer Sean Smith, and security officers Tyrone S. Woods and Glen A. Doherty<a href="">Erin A. Kirk-Cuomo</a>/DOD, via Flickr

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Wednesday marks the 12-year anniversary of the 9/11 attacks—and the first anniversary of the Benghazi, Libya, terror attack that left four Americans dead, including ambassador Christopher Stevens. It’s a tragedy that partisans have exploited ever since, trying to create an explosive Obama scandal (“Watergate and Iran-Contra together and multiply it times maybe 10 or so,” as GOP Rep. Steve King described it) that quite frankly just isn’t there.

On Tuesday, the Heritage Foundation, one of DC’s conservative think tanks, hosted an event marking the anniversary of Benghazi-gate. Allen West—the former congressman and one-term tea party hero who plays fast and loose with facts—delivered the keynote. He discussed the supposed cover-up perpetrated by high-ranking officials (a claim hyped loudly by GOP lawmakers, Fox News, and other right-wing news outlets), as well as the “unintended consequences” of intervening in Libya—as well as Syria. “You cannot talk about Syria unless you talk about what occurred in Libya,” West said.

“I find it very hypocritical that at this moment in time the American people are being told that they have a moral obligation to go into Syria because of the chemical gas attacks, yet I never heard the same type of indignation coming from the president, nor this administration, when our national security interests were attacked” in Benghazi, he added toward the end of his address. “If there was a time to commit the United States forces to do something, that would’ve been the time. I guarantee you, you would’ve had old retirees like me saying, ‘I’ll suit up, I’ll go.'”

On Facebook, West pushed the Benghazi-Syria link more aggressively. “It’s Obama and his acolytes are [sic] embarking upon a media blitz to convey a failing message of US military engagement in Syria,” he posted on Sunday. “Why should we listen to President Obama?…This week we shall remember the four Americans who were abandoned by Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton as they came under attack a year ago on 9-11…Starting Monday through Tuesday evening, melt down the White House phone lines, email, Facebook, and Obama’s twitter with a simple message, “Remember the Benghazi 4.”…NO to military action in Syria. Remember the Benghazi 4!”

This line of rhetoric isn’t unique to West. Even since the national debate over intervention in Syria began, many conservatives have been eager to bring up Benghazi, non sequiturs be damned. Here’s a breakdown of their key arguments and conspiracy theories.

1. Team Obama is devoid of credibility because of Benghazi.

  • “I can’t discuss the possibility of the US involvement in Syria’s civil war without also talking about Benghazi…The administration has a serious credibility issue with the American people due to the unanswered questions surrounding the terrorist attack in Benghazi almost a year ago.” Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-S.C.) to Secretary of State John Kerry at a September 4 House committee hearing
  • “Special Ops Vet Group Wants Truth About Benghazi Before Syria Strike”, September 5
  • “W.H. Sends Out [Susan] Rice, Who Misled on Benghazi, to Make Case for Syria” Weekly Standard, September 9

2. Obama is wagging the dog.

  • “With the president’s red line, why was there no call for military response in April? Was it delayed to divert attention today from the Benghazi, IRS, NSA scandals, the failure of Obamacare enforcement, the tragedy of the White House-drafted sequestration or the upcoming debt limit vote?” —Rep. Joe “You Lie!” Wilson (R-S.C.), September 4
  • “And all of a sudden we have to go to war that doesn’t make any sense at all…And so this whole thing is about covering the trail of the lost weapons from Benghazi.”Glenn Beck, September 9

3. Bombing Syria is taking our eyes off of the jihadist ball.

  • “One of the problems with all of the focus on Syria is it’s missing the ball from what we should be focused on, which is the grave threat from radical Islamic terrorism…When [the Benghazi attack] happened, the president promised to hunt down the wrong-doers, and yet a few months later, the issue has disappeared. You don’t hear the president mention Benghazi. Now it’s a ‘phony scandal.'” —Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), September 8

So there you have it, a new conservative meme: What’s going on with Syria—the chemical weapons, the tens of thousands of people slaughtered, the refugee crisis, the potential airstrikes—is kind of a big deal, but…Benghazi.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend