Report: When It Comes To the Deficit, Washington is Still Acting Like It’s 2010

<a href="">Christian Delbert</a>/Shutterstock

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Washington’s obsession with the nation’s budget deficit is a mistake, according to a new report released Wednesday by the liberal Center for American Progress (CAP). Congress and President Barack Obama are locked in a budget-cutting state of mind, still hoping to reach some sort of a grand bargain deficit reduction deal later this year that would replace the sweeping spending cuts that went into effect in March.

But as the report notes, the state of the economy has changed since 2010, the year that talks over how to reduce the deficit began:

  • The deficit has fallen by $2.5 trillion, due to tax increases and big spending cuts already enacted.
  • Growth in health care costs has slowed.
  • Inflation and interest rates are still low, despite concern that running a big deficit would increase them.
  • The key academic argument that high debt causes slower economic growth has fallen apart.
  • Austerity policies in Europe have not worked out so well.
  • The US economy has not come back to life as quickly as was projected when all the budget cutting began.

“Much has changed,” Michael Linden, the author of the CAP report, writes, “and the debate should change with it.”

Although the initial push for austerity came from the right, Obama and congressional Democrats soon fell in line. As Ezra Klein noted at Wonkblog Thursday, lower deficit forecasts didn’t change Rep. Paul Ryan’s (R-Wisc.) budget-cutting mania. “With some of the urgency gone, did Ryan ease up on the cuts to programs like Medicaid and food stamps?” Klein writes. “Of course not….The facts changed. The policies in the Republican budget didn’t.” As for Democrats, Klein says, “they’ve kept pursuing the exact kind of budget deals that led to sequestration in the first place.” Obama put forward a budget in April that, as Linden says, “goes well beyond halfway to meet the demands of conservatives in Congress.”

“It is time to reset the entire budget debate,” Linden says. “No more pretending that the sky is falling.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend