Obama’s Labor Pick Could be Cabinet’s Most Progressive Member

Thomas Perez, head of the Justice Department's civil rights division.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryanjreilly/4078828868/" target="_blank">Flickr/ryanjreilly</a>

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

President Barack Obama will nominate Thomas Perez, currently the head of the Justice Department’s civil rights division, to be the next secretary of labor, Politico reports.

Perez is well-regarded by organized labor and his tenure as the head of the civil rights division has been praised by civil rights groups. But he’s long been a target of the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Chuck Grassley. Grassley’s concerns revolve around Perez’s involvement in a Minnesota fair housing case. The division has also come under fire from Republicans over its handling of the New Black Panther voter intimidation case, but an Inspector General’s report released last week did not conclude that the decision to narrow the case, which was made before Perez was confirmed, was based on racial or political bias.

If confirmed, Perez would likely be the most progressive member of Obama’s cabinet, which is reason enough for Republicans to fight his nomination


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend