It’s Not Illegal To Buy a Gun for a Criminal

<a href="">lkeskinen</a>/Shutterstock

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Want to buy an AR-15 for a friend who happens to be in a Mexican drug cartel? The way gun laws stand right now, you can: It’s not illegal to purchase guns for a criminal. And federal laws surrounding gun trafficking across the border are notoriously weak. Legislation that Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) unveiled Wednesday would help fix that.

The Stop Illegal Trafficking in Firearms Act, co-sponsored by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), strengthens laws governing the “straw purchase” of firearms, or the buying of guns or ammunition for someone who is prohibited from owning one. Under current law, it is only a crime to transfer a firearm to someone else with the knowledge that the person will use it in a crime. So prosecutors usually cobble together “paperwork” violations such as lying on federal forms in order to bring charges against a straw purchaser. Leahy’s bill prohibits weapons transfers in which the transferor has “reasonable cause to believe” that the firearm will be used in criminal activity, and sets up heavy penalties for doing so.

The proposed bill would also make it a crime to smuggle firearms out of the United States. No, that law does not yet exist (there are laws addressing smuggling into the country.) Since 2006, more than 60,000 guns have moved from American gun dealers to Mexican cartels. ATF agent and “Fast and Furious” whistleblower John Dodson has called gun laws governing smuggling “toothless.”

“When the President spoke last week about the need for legislative action in the wake of the horrific events at Sandy Hook Elementary School last month, strengthening our law enforcement efforts against illegal gun trafficking was one of the key issues he noted,” said Leahy. “This bill will answer that call to action.” (If you’re worried this bill is a war on Christmas though, don’t fret. The bill contains exemptions for “the transfer of a firearm as a gift.”)

Leahy’s “modest measure” could “presage the sorts of legislative avenues that could find support among both Republicans and Democrats,” writes Jennifer Steinhauer at the New York Times The Caucus blog. Meanwhile, the proposed assault-weapons ban that Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Ca.) will roll out Thursday likely will not face such a rosy reception. The two bills, Steinhauer notes, “underscore the tension among Senate Democrats over how to proceed with President Obama’s call for legislative measures to combat gun violence.”


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend