Ken Cuccinelli’s Messy Relationship With Mental Health

Virginia attorney general Ken Cuccinelli. <a href="http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151144504183692&set=pb.8658098691.-2207520000.1359500433&type=3&src=http%3A%2F%2Fsphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-snc7%2F577414_10151144504183692_2024292038_n.jpg&size=960%2C643">Ken Cuccinelli</a>/Facebook

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Pressed at Saturday’s National Review Institute Summit on how best to fight back against President Obama’s gun control campaign, Virginia attorney general Ken Cuccinelli didn’t blink. While he was quick to criticize the President’s approach, there was “an awful lot we can do to make Virginia Techs and Sandy Hooks less likely.” Then Cuccinelli—who recently declared his candidacy for governorpivoted to mental health. “I’m as frugal a participant in government as you can find,” Cuccinelli said. “But I believe government has a role in helping people who through no fault of their own” suffer from mental illness.

So what did Cuccinelli, who described himself in his remarks (and on his gubernatorial campaign website) as a leader on mental health isssues, think of President Obama’s own post-Newtown proposals to improve mental health treatment? “I haven’t seen them,” he told me after the panel. (They’re here.)

That’s surprising, given his stated commitment to the issue. It’s also a bummer, because—as with many of his conservative colleagues, including the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre—Cuccinelli’s warnings about gun-grabbing mask the fact that he broadly shares Obama’s priorities on a key aspect of the gun-control package.

“There probably is a decent amount of common ground,” said Mira Signer, executive director of the Virginia chapter of National Alliance on Mental Illness, who has tracked Cuccinelli’s career closely. “I don’t think that there’s total alignment or even partial alignment, because a lot of what the president is calling for in terms of the mental health aspects of the plan is early intervention, more robust workforce, training, more services.” But Cucccinelli, she says, has made it clear that “he understands that those things are important.”

In Virginia, Cuccinelli has walked the walk—at least in part. Signer praised Cuccinelli as one of the few lawmakers in either party to make mental health a priority in the state. As a state senator and again as attorney general, he worked to modernize the state’s sorting system and improve outpatient treatment. “It was good to have somebody like him who was in such a high position,” Signer said.

But there was a caveat. Even as Cuccinelli worked to update the state’s system, he’s spent much of his time in Richmond working to tear it apart. “We would sort of juxtapose all of that particularly against his opposition to the Affordable Care Act, which in Virginia is something that can really significantly benefit people with mental illness, particularly with Medicaid* expansion,” Signer said. ACA mandated that health insurance plans include coverage for mental illness—and (you may have heard) mandated that everyone who could afford it purchase said health insurance.

Given his courtroom fumbling of a challenge to ACA, perhaps the best thing Cuccinelli ever did for mental health in Virginia was being a bad lawyer.

*Correction: This post originally referred to the federal program in question as Medicare.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest