“Super PAC” Makes It Into the Dictionary

It finally happened: The term “Super PAC” will be added to the dictionary. Politico reports that the term is expected to appear in Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary and Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged. The publication also talked to the woman responsible for the coinage:

/Shutterstockanaken2012/Shutterstock

Eliza Newlin Carney, the reporter who first coined the term in print on June 26, 2010, while working at National Journal…never imagined that a word she made up would find its way inside the big book. “I had a feeling it’d catch on, but not like this,” said Carney, now with Roll Call…The term replaces the far more technical “independent expenditure-only political action committee.”

Super PAC” will appear along with other recently approved words, including “energy drink,” “sexting,” “mash-up,” “game changer,” “gastropub,” “man cave,” the Oprah-coined “aha moment,” and “f-bomb.”

Super-PACs have spent upward of $700 million during the 2012 elections, and have attracted nearly endless controversy. Here’s a frame of reference to demonstrate just how relevant they were to this election season: In 2012, the New York Times published the term “super PAC” 1,126 times between January 1 and November 15. In 2010, the paper only published it three times.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest