Why the Romney VP App Wasn’t a #Fail

mittromney.tumblr.com

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis, the election, and more, subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.


Gawker‘s Louis Peitzman makes a claim I’ve seen a lot, especially from progressives, in the wake of Mitt Romney’s selection of Rep. Paul Ryan as his running mate: The campaign kind of blew it. Not on the substance, mind you, but on the rollout. “I’m not saying this was a complete fail on the Romney campaign’s part, but to pretend that they announced Paul Ryan exactly as they’d said they would — via smartphone app, and then in a joint public appearance — is just silly,” Peitzman writes. “Instead of admitting they botched their plan to obfuscate, the Romney campaign is pushing a Hardy Boys narrative…”

Peitzman is missing something really important. The real purpose of the Romney VP app wasn’t to break the VP announcement. Sure, that’s how they pitched it. But the Romney folks (probably) aren’t so delusional as to think they’d be able to keep a secret all the way up to the roll-out.

The VP app served the same purpose the Obama campaign’s 2008 promise to text its supports its VP pick did: It was an excuse to collect your data. Although it was predictably scooped by the New York Times and CNN, Team Obama was able to collect 2.9 million phone numbers using this gimmick. Those numbers were used for fundraising and organizing efforts later in the campaign. (The downside: A glitch prevented half of Obama’s text-message subscribers from receiving the announcement text.) Download the Romney VP iPhone app and it informs you that “By using this application, you may be placed on Romney for President Inc.’s contact list to receive campaign updates… Romney for President’s regular Privacy Policy shall apply.” Romney doesn’t want you to be the first to know about his personnel moves; he wants your email and mailing address.

Since we don’t know how many people signed up for the VP app—70,000 people have downloaded Romney’s other app—it’s too early to call it a rousing success for Romney. But it’s not right to call it a #fail.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest