Real Talk: Mitt Romney is Actually Pretty Conservative

GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney speaks at Solyndra's Fremont, Calif. headquarters.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mittromney/7310519022/sizes/z/in/photostream/">Mitt Romney</a>/Flickr

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


McKay Coppins had a good piece at Buzzfeed on Friday looking at the contrasting styles of Mitt Romney and John McCain. The short of it is that the conservative base was always suspicious of McCain, and he encouraged their fears by failing to show sufficient “grit.” Romney, as demonstrated by his campaign’s coordinated heckling of David Axelrod and the candidate’s surprise visit to Solyndra, is different. The base is happy—happy enough to overlook the fact that Romney is a moderate. As Coppins puts it, “[H]is new appeal to the right marks a recognition that he can court conservatives without, in any traditional sense, ‘tacking right.'”

Really, though? The evidence on the first point is compelling; one conservative Coppins spoke to even compares Romney’s stunt war to Andrew Breitbart. But the evidence is also pretty clear that moderate Romney tacked very, very hard to the right over the course of the GOP primary. If conservatives are learning to love Romney, in part it’s because he’s adopted almost all of their preferred policies. Romney has been a vocal supporter of Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget, which the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities said at the time “would produce the largest redistribution of income from the bottom to the top in modern U.S. history, while increasing poverty and inequality more than any measure in recent times and possibly in the nation’s history.”

Romney came out against gay adoption the day after President Obama came out in favor of gay marriage. He supports eliminating all funding for Planned Parenthood from the federal budget, which is a roundabout way of saying he supports eliminating Title X funding for women’s health—a position that puts him to the right of Rick Santorum. He’s gone from holding progressive views on climate change to saying “we don’t know” whether humans have anything to do it. If deliberately ignoring the overwhelming scientific consensus to raise money and win votes isn’t tacking to the right, I’m really at a loss as to what is.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest