People to Politicians: Eliminate Super-PACs And We’ll Vote For You


Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Newsflash: Americans want political candidates who’ll get rid of super-PACs and rid our elections of unaccountable dark money. And according to the results of a new poll, they’re prepared to vote to make that happen.

That’s a key takeaway from a poll unveiled Wednesday by Democracy Corps, the polling firm Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, and Public Campaign Action Fund, which supports curbing the amount of money in politics. Fifty-two percent of those polled, of all political persuasions, said they wouldn’t vote for a candidate unless he or she committed to reducing the role of money in politics.

Neither of the two dominant political parties has yet seized the issue of fixing the nation’s campaign finance system. But when one does, pollster Stan Greenberg says, it could pay off at the voting booth. “One of the parties needs to be seen as taking the initiative, cleaning up how we pay for elections,” he said. “We’re dealing with a corrupt system that’s a mess, where urgent reform is necessary, and where neither party has the advantage, but clearly there’s the opportunity.”

That desire to elect candidates who’ll mend the nation’s tattered campaign finance system grows out of a widespread loathing for big money in politics. Nearly all of those polled by GQR slammed the influence of super-PACs, which can raise and spend unlimited sums of money and have cranked up the negative tone of elections nationwide. Nearly 75 percent of respondents said they supported limiting the amount of money in politics; among tea party supporters, support for curbing political money topped 60 percent. “There aren’t many things we’ve tested that are viewed as negatively as super-PACs,” pollster Stan Greenberg said in a call with reporters.

You should, however, take these results with a grain of salt. Polls focusing on the money-in-politics issue may draw out strong opinions, but campaign finance barely registers in broader surveys about what issues matter to Americans. In an April analysis by the Pew Research Center, for instance, Americans said the economy, jobs, and the nation’s budget deficit topped their list of concerns. Campaign finance was nowhere to be found. 

Here are the full results of the poll:

May 2012 GQR Money in Politics Poll Results

More Mother Jones reporting on Dark Money


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend