Senate Republicans to Obama: Approve Keystone XL or Else!

Photo by Kate Sheppard.

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Last month, Republicans in Congress succeeded in getting a provision attached to a bill extending the payroll tax cut that forces the Obama administration to make a decision on the Keystone XL pipeline within 60 days. Now Obama has until Feb. 21 to issue a verdict on the proposed 1,661-mile pipeline from Canada to Texas.

But in reality, Republicans gave Obama an easy out here. In order to approve the pipeline, he’d have to railroad the review process, which has not been completed yet. He’d also have to ignore a bunch of our nation’s fundamental environmental laws, like the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). Obama could just say that he can’t approve the project because they forced him to violate other laws.

Now Republicans are at work on yet another way to get around the White House on Keystone. North Dakota Sen. John Hoeven (R) released a draft bill that would take away the president’s authority on the pipeline if he doesn’t grant his approval. Basically, Republicans in Congress forced Obama to make a decision, and if he decides in a way they don’t like, they’re going to ignore him anyway.

Reuters reports that Hoeven is working on the new legislation with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Sens. Richard Lugar (Ind.), David Vitter (La.), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Mike Johanns (Neb.). The bill would allow work on the pipeline to begin right away—environmental laws be damned. (It would, however, let Nebraska continue its negotiation with TransCanada, the company that wants to build the massive pipeline, on an alternative route through that state.)

Hoeven also held a press conference with the president of TransCanada—just in case it wasn’t clear whose side he’s on.



Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend