Poll: Gingrich Rising In South Carolina, Fueled By Debate Performance


South Carolina is warming to Newt Gingrich, according to the latest survey from Public Policy Polling, which shows Gingrich with a six-point lead over Mitt Romney:

Newt Gingrich led Mitt Romney 34-28 in PPP’s South Carolina polling last night, the first of what will be three nights of tracking. Ron Paul at 15%, Rick Santorum at 14%, Rick Perry at 5%, and Buddy Roemer at 3% round out the field.

PPP speculates that Gingrich’s strong debate performance—in which he lectured debate moderator Juan Williams on the subject of race and food stamps—has a lot to do with his rise in the polls. According to their statement, “56% of voters say they watched it, and with those folks Gingrich’s lead over Romney is 43-27.” How much of that has to do with Gingrich’s “food stamp” rhetoric is anyone’s guess, though the campaign felt so strongly about that exchange that they turned it into a campaign ad

Gingrich got another boost Thursday when Rick Perry dropped out and endorsed him. Unfortunately for Gingrich, whatever momentum he gets from the Perry endorsement is going to be mixed with the revelation from Newt’s second wife Marianne Gingrich that he had asked her for an “open marriage” while cheating on her with the former House staffer who would become his third wife. Gingrich has spent much of his career deriding as “gay secular fascism” the desires of same-sex couples to have their relationships be legally recognized the same way Gingrich’s three marriages have. So it’s news that Gingrich’s second wife is accusing him of believing that marriage is between a man and a woman and a woman, ect.

As Reason’s Mike Riggs points out, two of Gingrich’s favorite targets, Muslims and atheists, are “two demographics that bear the polyamorous stereotype.” Perhaps when Gingrich said he was worried about America becoming “a secular atheist country, potentially one dominated by radical Islamists,” he was concerned about giving into temptation. 

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest