Which Is Weirder—Iowa or New Hampshire? Take the Quiz.

Variations on a theme: Grant Wood's American Gothic (left), and the label for New Hampshire-based Smuttynose IPA<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Grant_DeVolson_Wood_-_American_Gothic.jpg">Grant Wood</a>/Wikimedia Commons; <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tuaussi/1753020912/sizes/z/in/photostream/">Smuttynose Brewing Company</a>/Flickr

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

New Hampshire voters are different than you. So we’ve been told, anyway. “New Hampshire voters are no pushovers,” writes the Los Angeles Times, informing us the the residents of the Granite State are, variously, “cranky,” “obdurate,” and “independent.” They’re also “Yankee stoics,” “no-nonsense,” and “rock-ribbed,” adds McClatchy’s David Lightman. Conservative talk radio host Mark Steyn calls New Hampshirites “crusty,” “cranky,” and “contrarian.” Hardball host Chris Matthews attempted to sum up the state’s electorate as “real,” “American,” and “flinty.” “We take the vetting of the candidates very seriously,” says Republican Kelly Ayotte, the state’s junior senator.

New Hampshire voters are many things (or at least many different varieties of rock), but one thing they are absolutley not is Iowan. That’s the message that’s seeped out over the last 12 months or so from politicians, editorial boards, and even a few candidates. “They pick corn in Iowa; they pick presidents in New Hampshire,” said Jon Huntsman, who’s banking his presidential fortunes on the relative cranky flintiness of Granite State residents. MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell best captured the conventional wisdom, explaining that, contra New Hampshire, Iowa is “too white, too evangelical, too rural” to make much of a difference on the GOP nominating race. (New Hampshire is 93.9 percent white; Iowa is 91 percent).

But are they really so different? My colleague Andy Kroll busted the myth of New Hampshire maverick voter on Friday. And a quick comparison of the two states’ legislative activity over the last three years reveals some serious overlap. Is Iowa the crazy one? Or was it New Hampshire? Match the nutty proposal with the appropriate state:

1.) Warning that the legalization of gay marriage would bring about undesired changes to the state, a Republican state senator in 2010 vows to be “vigilant” in preventing state parks from offering family discounts to same-sex couples.

2.) Republicans attempt to repeal gay marriage in the state in 2011, due to concerns that allowing two men to tie the know “would facilitate the introduction of an aspect of Shariah or Islamic law that permits a man to have up to four wives.”

3.) Two Republican state representatives ask the state attorney general in January to reconsider whether President Barack Obama was qualified to appear on the November ballot, alleging that the president may not be a natural-born citien because his father was born in Kenya. After a birther lawsuit was thrown out in November, two top aides to the state attorney general “locked themselves in an office and called capitol security” because they feared for their safety.

4.) State senator introduces birther bill in 2011 to require “birth certificates to be filed with affidavits of candidacy for presidential and vice presidential candidates”

5.) State Legislature consider a bill mandating that any new law that affects individual liberties “include a direct quote from the Magna Carta” explaining where those rights came from.

6.) Local tea party group purchases billboard comparing President Obama to Hitler and Lenin, with the slogan “live free or die.”

7.) State Legislature floats proposal in 2012 to force public schools to teach students about the moral bankruptcy of the theory of evolution. “It’s a worldview and it’s godless,” one state representative explains. “Atheism has been tried in various societies, and they’ve been pretty criminal domestically and internationally. The Soviet Union, Cuba, the Nazis, China today: They don’t respect human rights.”

8.) State House passes a 2009 bill asserting state sovereignty and considers another resolution two years later to nullify the Affordable Care Act.

9.) Considers legislation in 2011 that would classify the murder of abortion providers as “justifiable homicide.”

10.) In 2010 House Republicans attempt to repeal a law requiring public schools to provide kindergarten.

11.) Picks Pat Buchanan over Bob Dole in 1996.

12.) Picks Pat Robertson over George H.W. Bush for president in 1988.

Answers: 1.) IA, 2.) NH, 3.) NH, 4.) IA, 5.) NH, 6.) IA, 7.) NH, 8.) NH, 9.) IA, 10.) NH, 11.) NH, 12.) IA.


Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

payment methods

We Recommend